Epidemiologic studies on asthmatics and in vitro data suggest a protective role of T2 inflammation in SARS-CoV-2 infection. Using a large, multisite cohort, we studied clinical outcomes following SARS-CoV-2 infection in multiple asthma endotypes and examined the effects of T2-directed biologics in infected asthmatics.in Methods: The National COVID Cohort Collaborative (N3C) Data Enclave was used to identify and stratify asthmatic patients by endotype to include non-T2 and T2 asthmatics, as well as exposure to T2-directed biologic therapy. We evaluated the risk of hospitalization, invasive mechanical ventilation, and 90-day mortality by endotype and exposure to biologics. For this study, 402,376 patients met inclusion criteria, of which 138,142 (34%) were characterized as non-T2 and 264,234 (66%) as T2 asthmatics, a group further divided into 104,823 (26%) atopic, 84,440 (21%) eosinophilic, and 74,971 (19%) T2-high asthmatic endotypes. Compared to non-T2 asthmatics, atopic and T2-high asthmatics experienced decreased odds of hospitalization, and 90-day mortality. Conversely, eosinophilic asthmatics experienced higher odds of hospitalization, intubation, and 90-day mortality. Exposure to T2-directed biologic therapies did not alter outcomes after propensity score matching. In contrast, maximum eosinophil count and recent systemic corticosteroid use were directly correlated with increased odds of all outcomes. COVID-19 outcomes differ depending on asthma endotype, with atopic asthmatics experiencing lower odds and eosinophilic asthmatics experiencing higher odds of deleterious outcomes. T2-directed biologic treatment did not alter these outcomes but recent systemic corticosteroid use predisposes all asthmatics patients to adverse outcomes. This article is open access and distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial No Derivatives License 4.0 (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).